Posts Tagged ‘Google’

I invented Google+

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011
Google Plus

OK, now I have your attention I’ll confess that this isn’t exactly true… But I would direct people to a post of mine back in August 2009, where an associate and I proposed an idea for filtering tweets based on audience. I’m delighted that this has now come to life through Google+ Circles, but wonder if the problems I foresaw back in 2009 will still prove to be a stumbing block for Google.

I’m still getting familiar with Google+, setting up and expanding my Circles. I hope to blog more about it soon.

The long way round

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

This post has been written for Blogging Against Disablism Day 2010.

I recently bought a new phone. It’s great, but like most smartphones it’s taking a bit of time to get completely used to the complex interface.

On the second day of playing with it, I was browsing the web and came across a site which had Captcha. It was a Google product, and I had to complete the Captcha field to continue with what I wanted to do. The problem was, the image that it had come up with was terribly distorted, and I couldn’t make out the letters and numbers. I tried several possibilities, failing every time. Normally I would simply refresh the page to get a new image, but I hadn’t yet learned how to do that on my phone! I tried going back then forwards again, but it just loaded the same image. And crucially, there was no link to an accessible alternative.

It was one of those rare occasions where I had hit an absolute brick wall because of an inaccessible web design feature.

Read more about taking the long way round

2009 on the web – some retrospectives

Thursday, December 31st, 2009

As we glide gracefully out of the noughties, here are some of the best retrospectives of the past year on the web.

2009 on the web – some retrospectives

Google and accessibility – not there yet

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Earlier today I signed an online petition to encourage Google to take a leading role in promoting accessible web development. The petition, launched by a Canadian web developer, suggests that

Google has not taken a strong lead in producing standards compliant, accessible web sites. Although contributing to the W3C and other standards bodies, the many sites that Google produces do limit access to people with disabilities. Given the web presence that Google has, this is enough of a problem, however it is worsened by the fact that Google’s model is copied regularly by web developers looking for an industry standard to follow.

Google Accessibility

A new home for accessibility at Google

Google were impressively quick to respond, posting a link on the petition to a new official blog post entitled A New Home for Accessibility at Google, by accessibility product manager Jonas Klink.

Read about Google’s response to the petition

Social media filtering – a flawed idea?

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

Update July 2011 – our idea has come into being! Google+ offers much of the functionality we were longing for in the below post, yet the problems I mention could still be a stumbling block…

I recently had a great back-of-a-beer-mat brainstorm with @spartakan exploring the advantages of being able to tag Tweets (and other similar Social Networking content) by intended recipient and for the recipient to be able to filter them accordingly.

My angle was that my use of Twitter is purely professional, and I’m not that interested in the chatty element of it. If I could filter out the personal stuff, monitoring other people’s Tweets would become much more efficient and relevant. Equally, @spartakan had a problem on Facebook where both friends and colleagues have added him. Like so many Facebook users, he has found the blurring lines between work and social life to be a little disturbing.

Our thinking was that you could Tweet (or whatever) to groups of followers or friends based on some simple criteria. So you might post a Personal Tweet, for example, which would only go to followers interested in your personal updates. Equally, a Professional Tweet would only go to those following your professional updates.

Problem number 1: Friend or colleague – who defines the relationship?

From a followers’ point of view, I’d like to have control of what my status in relation to others is. For example:

  • My relationship to person A is that he works in my field of professional interest, although I don’t know him, so I only want his professional updates.
  • I am friends with person B and I only want her personal updates.
  • I work with person C but see him socially so I want both personal and professional updates from him.

But what if it’s not up to me to set the status? What if it is up to those I am following, and person B thinks I’m interested in her professional updates? From my point of view, the system falls down.

Problem number 2: Appropriate tagging – who will bother?

The closest we’ve got to decent filtering on Twitter is through the use of hashtags. Using these, we can search for subjects which we’re interested in. It’s a crude, user-invented form of meta-tagging, but it works quite well. If we were to introduce additional meta-tagging, though, to enable this filtering, how can we be sure that people will do so appropriately (i.e. actually tag their professional updates as such)? Actually, I think we can be fairly sure that many people won’t.

Problem 3: Complexity vs adoption

The Professional/Personal model is a very simpistic one, and in real life we’d need many more categories. @spartakan mentioned that he’d like to distinguish between friends and family on Facebook, and this is a common issue (people not wanting their mum to see their photos of drunken nights out and so on). The trouble is that the more complex it becomes, the less likely people are to use it correctly (if at all).