Posts Tagged ‘council’

Joining the conversation – handling complaints via Social Media

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

A colleague recently raised the issue of how we handle complaints that come in via social media, and this got me thinking about the impact of these channels on how we deliver customer service in general. It’s a massive topic, with an awful lot of angles to consider, so here are just a few thoughts.

To start, though, I thought I’d have a quick look at what people were tweeting about in relation to my organisation (LinkedIn has a handy feature called Company Buzz which makes this easier). As expected, the results were not great.

Some recent feedback on Twitter

Some recent feedback on Twitter

You can immediately see why this subject is an important one, especially if the individuals posting such comments have a lot of followers (as the recent Dooce vs Maytag story proved). But do these individuals expect the Council to respond? And if so, what should we be doing?

My thoughts on handling complaints via social media

Auto-play: a usability and accessibility failure

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

My organisation recently published a number of videos on the public website (EDIT – have removed the link as the videos have been taken off now). Those videos started automatically as soon as the page loaded. The problems with this are:

  1. Automatically playing audio on a webpage is usually an action which the user will not expect. It is therefore, at the very least, an irritation, especially if the user is in an environment where this is not appropriate.
  2. At worst, though, the audio may conflict with other audio that the user is already listening to. That might be music, or perhaps another video. But far worse, it could be a blind user’s screen reader software, and the resulting conflict would make it very hard to browse that page to pause the video or mute the sound.

More about why autoplay is bad for usability and accessibility

Cybersquatting 2.0 – protecting your name in Social Media

Monday, June 8th, 2009

The rise and rise of Social Networking Sites has brought about new risks to an organisation’s online brand, but whilst my last post explored Web 2.0 mistakes which organisation could make themselves, another type of risk is what others may do with your brand if you don’t get there first, through Social Media Cybersquatting. The risks of cybersquatters in a Web 2.0 world

Tales of a Web 2.0 city

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

I’ve recently been made aware of a really interesting project that Edinburgh Council’s libraries service has been involved in. It’s a bold venture into Web 2.0 waters, under the umbrella brand of Tales of One City.

The whole thing is brought together by a public page on Netvibes (a personalised web portal, similar to iGoogle). You can find it at www.netvibes.com/talesofonecity.

Netvibes screenshot

Tales of One City Netvibes page

The page has a customised theme (with an image of books as the header) and an embedded Google Search bar. It then serves up 12 widgets, pulling in information from various sources.
Read more about Tales of One City and the benefits and risks of Web 2.0 in local government

Report from Scottish Public Sector Barcamp 27th March

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009
Microsoft Offices at Waverley Gate

Microsoft Offices, Edinburgh

At 5pm last Friday, dozens of like-minded web enthusiasts gathered at the Microsoft offices at Waverley Gate, Edinburgh, for a Scottish Public Sector Barcamp meetup. On the agenda was everything from Web 2.0 and social media to the credit crunch and website rationalisation, and we only had two hours to put the world to rights.
(more…)

Slippery deadlines not good for business

Tuesday, December 30th, 2008

I’ve had cause to think about this subject recently when we had a bit of a palaver over the public deadline for our online school enrolment forms. Released in mid-November, the deadline was set at December 24th. A bit tight, I thought, but it’s not my position to question such things. Christmas came and went, and I asked if it was appropriate to now remove the forms, given that the deadline had passed. Oh no, I was told, as by law we must accept applications until 15th March. I was then asked to amend the deadline date accordingly. The December deadline was a fake.

Although I can understand that it is useful to receive submissions as early as possible, to allow staff to manage their workloads, it seems a bit unreasonable to present a false deadline which is then discretely extended. Many people will have put themselves to great inconvenience to complete this form in time, especially given the time of year, and to find that the deadline has been extended by almost three months will no doubt cause annoyance. There is also the risk that citizens will stop taking deadlines seriously, and may miss the window of opportunity in the future, where stated deadlines are genuine.

Far better, perhaps, to give the genuine deadline, but state that early submission is recommended. In some cases (for example, applying for grants from a limited fund) you could even suggest that early submissions will receive preference – that should get people moving!

Consultations

Similar issues have dogged some recent consultations that we’ve held, with deadlines being pushed back and back to try to squeeze out more responses. The problem here is that those who aimed for the original deadline may not have given themselves sufficient time to compose a full and accurate response. Those who replied early on are likely to be those who feel strongest about the subject of the consultation, and therefore the kind of people you want to listen to carefully and not annoy.

Of course, there are some instances where extending a deadline is sensible. In a consultation where new information has come to light, for example, or where there has been a technical problem preventing people from completing the process. In such cases, the reason for the extension should always be made clear. Otherwise, the organisation risks looking unorganised and unprofessional.

Project deadlines

The same applies to project deadlines. I recently finished a job which had to be completed by a certain date. No problem there – I’m used to tight deadlines. But when the delivery day arrived, the client came back with a few tweaks and some new requests, and it turned out the original deadline wasn’t as crucial as first made out. These fake deadlines don’t do the developer any favours – many things may get rushed or dropped entirely as a result. Also, it’s usually a lot harder to change a final product, rather than factor in any modifications as part of the build process. It’s therefore far more productive to set milestones, where you deliver certain things by certain timescales. This allows for a far smoother progression from planning to the final product.

Government 2.0 – current initiatives wiki

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008

I’ve just been looking at a wiki of current initiatives for Goverment 2.0 – that is, government’s use of social media.

At the moment it has a heavy leaning towards US and Canadian initiatives, although there is a smattering of international efforts too. There are some great examples, including:

  • Wikis to improve internal collaboration
  • Geo-tagged images on Flickr
  • Podcasts to reach new audiences
  • Lots of use of Blogs, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, SecondLife etc etc…

Hopefully this wiki will continue to grow, and the intention is for it to eventually offer best practices. Kudos to Mike Kujawski for creating the wiki, as well as to Jose Alonso (W3C eGovernment Interest Group) for the heads-up.

Local government blogs

Friday, December 5th, 2008

When I hear people in my organisation talk about starting an official blog, I am split in two. Half of me is excited by the prospect, whilst the other half cringes at the risks.

Headstar’s E-Government Bulletin has an interesting report on the recent E-Democracy 2008 conference, addressing the issue of blogging and digital dialogues. This got me thinking about the subject (you’ll see my initial thoughts at the end of that very article), and I’ve since been looking further into the world of public sector (and more specifically, local government) blogs.

Some examples

Technorati reports that it is tracking the existence of 112 million blogs. Surprisingly, then, it was a little difficult to find really good examples of well-executed local government blogs. Here are some examples, though, listing the good and the bad points of each:

Kent County Council Leader’s Blog

Plus points:

  • Last post just 9 days old at the time of writing, with 3 or 4 posts a months on average
  • The posts seem to relate well to current events
  • The post titles are brief but descriptive
  • The posts offer relevant hyperlinks
  • Commenting not available, but an e-mail link offered
  • Some honest and personal views

Minus points

  • A very obvious political agenda
  • The only image is one of the blogger himself
  • No RSS feed available

London Borough of Lambeth Leader’s Blog

Plus points

  • Well established blog – archive going back to October 2006
  • Good range of topic covered

Minus points

  • Erratic frequency – some months have 5+ posts, other months have none
  • The more recent posts appear at the bottom – big mistake!
  • Lack of images makes the pages very samey and uninspiring
  • No RSS feed available

Wiltshire Extranet Blog

Plus points

  • One post each and every week
  • All the trappings of a proper blog – archives, calendar, feeds, feedback

Minus points

  • Bizarrely, each post is a report of what the blogger will be doing, with no obvious follow-ups
  • An internal blog, meant for internal readers, available externally
  • No information about the blog or blogger (presumably due to its internal nature)

Durham County Council Leader’s blog

Plus points

  • Blog is combined with a diary to view upcoming appointments
  • Option to add comments, and the blogger has even responded to one
  • Fairly regular posts (although only been running less than 2 months)

Minus point

  • The blog launched in October, yet the ‘archive’ looks like it goes back to January. You can’t click on any of the months prior to October, adding to the confusion.
  • Again, lack of images makes for dull pages.
  • Not only a lack of corporate branding, but also a horrendous pink theme (OK, that one is subjective)

Pseudo-blogs

One issue which arose during my search related to the design and functionality of the blogs I encountered. Many blogs seemed to have been integrated into the main corporate website, and in fact in many cases were not technically blogs in the typical sense, but rather normal static web pages presenting chronological articles. Whilst there is nothing inherently wrong with this, it does rather stretch the blog metaphor. A typical blog has features such as categories and labels for filtering articles; the ability to comment on posts; RSS feeds or subscriptions to easily access new posts; automatically generated archives; and all manner of other widgets including polls, related links and tagclouds. These are important elements which define a blog as a Web 2.0 technology.

Lessons learned

The Durham blog is a great example of understanding the blog metaphor and adapting it to the interests of the users. By incorporating a diary, and then blogging about the events afterwards, you have a great premise for generating interest and engagement.

Lack of images was a big problem across the board, and is in fact an issue common with many blogs worldwide. A local gov organisation should have access to a wealth of stock photos which could be thrown in, where relevant, to liven up the pages. A crucial element of engaging the public is to make your channels of communication interesting, and the use of images seems like an essential ingredient in this.

The regularity of posts seemed to vary wildly, but a key point is the importance of consistency. One post per week is fine if that offers a summary of the week’s events. Any less than that and the blog risks looking sparse and unresponsive to events. A greater frequency might be appropriate but it has to be sustainable. Probably far better to stick to the weekly format unless urgent issues arise.

Although many of the features of the traditional blog are perhaps overkill, some key functions should remain. Allowing comments makes perfect sense – after all, the point of the blog is to create a dialogue. Archiving is obviously a must – that’s one of the things that makes it a blog. Promotion is a key issue, as the blog must be easy to find. RSS feeds will then make it easy for people to follow.

Conclusion

Blogs provide an excellent channel of communication with your citizens, and can very easily fit in with your other comms strategies. They are incredibly easy to set up, but far from easy to maintain to a high quality. They’ll demand lots of time, thought, creativity and buy-in. Because of this, the failure rate is likely to be high, but the rewards are there for the successful few.

Keeping up with your own news

Friday, November 21st, 2008

Our organisation has been in the news a fair bit recently. Well, actually, being a local authority we’re always in the local news and the coverage is rarely positive (and often inaccurate too). But what I’ve been increasingly concerned about recently is the fact that the local media keep getting there first – reporting on stories hours, sometimes days, before our own website publishes the information.

The case in point was demonstrated this week when my organisation made some important (and controversial) decisions on school closures. I’m assuming the press were notified through the usual channels, and the news made it onto their websites within hours. We, however, didn’t post an update on our website until the following afternoon.

The major problem with this, apart from it looking generally poor, is that it forces citizens to look elsewhere for information that we should be providing them with. This also means that the information they eventually find will probably have been edited, and is usually accompanied by a long string of unmoderated user comments positing all sorts of theories and opinions, many of which are stultifyingly ill-informed. And of course, most people will probably look to the media first anyway, but perhaps then come to our site to check the facts and to get background information. If we’re not providing content to coincide with news stories appearing elsewhere, and making it prominent from the homepage, we’re really failing our users.

It’s not that we have a lack of news either. I recently encountered a problem where important press releases were too quickly getting bumped off the home page (which only displays the 3 most recent releases, with a link through to the rest). Our school closures story, for example, got bumped within hours by two stories about awards ceremonies and another about tips for Christmas shopping. Whilst non-critical releases are great (SOCITM’s 2008 Better Connected report commended the 76% of local authority sites which featured ‘good current news beyond a report of a council meeting or decision’), if the softer stories are drowning out the more important ones we are again failing our users.

This is all compounded by the fact that our site does not support RSS feeds or news alerts, so we’re not actively ‘pushing’ these stories in the first place (SOCITM found that only 33% of local authority sites do either of these things). Our news stories are given good prominence on the homepage, but unless you actually visit our site you probably won’t find our press releases.

Another problem (which impacts the speed of all developments on our site) is that content often has to go via various levels of approval before it can be published. By speeding up this approval process, or by further devolving editorial authority, we could drastically improve our ability to react to news and events more quickly and effectively. Only then can we consider ourselves to be, as the Better Connected report puts it, newsworthy.

Key points:

  • Get press releases online as quickly or quicker than the media
  • Make them prominent on the homepage, for a reasonable period of time
  • Explore other methods of distributing news – RSS, alerts, e-mail digests, SMS, news tickers etc

Getting to grips with Web 2.0

Monday, October 27th, 2008

This Friday I’m off to the Scottish Web 2.0 Unconference in Edinburgh – “an informal, bar camp style event allowing participants to listen, network and share experiences with those who have designed and are managing Web 2 services”.

To prepare for this I thought I’d have a quick recap of what Web 2.0 means to me.

Wikipedia describes Web 2.0 thus:

Web 2.0 is a term describing changing trends in the use of World Wide Web technology and web design that aims to enhance creativity, secure information sharing, collaboration and functionality of the web.

What qualifies as Web 2.0 can sometimes be in debate, and Tim Berners-Lee himself has questioned the value of the term, but for me the above keywords ‘sharing, collaboration and functionality‘ strike at the heart of the matter. We’re talking about a concept in which previously passive users become contributors, where content can be pulled apart and seamlessly put back together again, and where new ideas and innovations can more easily be built upon existing platforms.

So what does this mean for the local gov web developer? The public sector is traditionally very slow at responding to trends and change, so many of us are currently in a situation where we’re locked out of the playground whilst the rest of the world has fun playing this new game. Why? Because of risk.

The perils of public opinion

The risks to which I’m referring are fairly obvious. Post a Youtube video and you may get negative comments; set up a MySpace profile and you don’t know who you’ll be making friends with; start a blog and people might find out you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about (*cough*). In essence, Web 2.0 is about giving power to the people – the Information Superhighway is no longer a one-way street (actually, it hasn’t been a one-way street for a long time, it’s just that continuing developments are making it easier, quicker and cheaper than ever to get involved).

Is this something that local government has the confidence to open itself up to? More often than not, regrettably, no. Once something is out there, there’s no bringing it back in. The lack of control is something that I’ve found to be a major sticking point. But the obvious rebuttal to this is that conversations are going on out there, whether we’re involved or not. Surely it’s far better to be playing the game badly than not playing at all?

Getting it wrong

Well, not always. There have been some good examples of why dipping your toes in the Web 2.0 waters can often lead to losing a pinkie. And although the biggest mistake would be to ignore Web 2.0 completely, there’s plenty of reasons to pause for thought. Bad examples we’ve seen recently include Youtube videos withdrawn because of inappropriate messages (someone forgot to dis-allow commenting) and social networking accounts shut down through lack of interest (very embarrassing to learn you have no friends).

So how can we avoid the pitfalls? Stephen Dale, in his excellent article on Utilising Web 2.0 in local government, gives the following tips:

Simple guidelines for Web 2.0 deployment

  • Don’t think about Web 2.0 or e-government as being just about technology. It is about saving time and making life easier and more efficient for citizens.
  • Make sure you are resourced to cope. No point setting up a blog that encourages comments if you can’t respond to each comment.
  • Carefully plan your strategy if using blogs. If it’s a council blog, make sure it’s part of a wider communications strategy and not the domain of one or two keen individuals.
  • Consider the reputational risks of publishing un-moderated citizen comments in online forums or blogs. Don’t assume comments represent universal opinion.
  • Identify the audience you are trying to reach and use the appropriate channel. Not everyone has an account on Facebook, Myspace or Bebo, and not everyone has broadband. Know who you are excluding and plan for this.
  • Ensure there is a staff policy for using social media sites during working hours.
  • Most Web 2.0 solutions are relatively cheap to deploy. If you are planning to spend more than £100k on an enterprise solution you’re doing something wrong – or you have particularly complex requirements.

From Stephen Dale’s Utilising Web 2.0 in local government

I’ll post more thoughts after Friday’s conference, but one thing is certain – it’s going to be a long and winding road.